Allen v. Jones
Rex Allen, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Gerald Jones, Defendant and Respondent.
- Court
- Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Dist., Div. Two
- Decided
- 1980-08-26
- Docket
- 21504
- Published
- published
01Procedural Posture
Plaintiff sued a crematorium for negligence and emotional distress after his brother's remains were lost in shipment. Demurrer sustained without leave to amend; plaintiff appealed.
02Substantive Facts
The defendant agreed to cremate and ship the remains of plaintiff's brother. The container arrived empty; the remains were never recovered.
03Issue
Whether damages for emotional distress are recoverable for negligent breach of a contract to handle human remains.
04Rule
Emotional-distress damages are recoverable in contract where the contract's subject matter is such that serious emotional disturbance is a particularly likely result of breach.
05Holding
Yes. The complaint states a cause of action for mental distress damages.
06Rationale / Reasoning
Contracts concerning the disposition of human remains are entered into for peace of mind rather than pecuniary advantage; economic loss alone would leave the breach effectively unremedied.
07Doctrine / Tests
Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 353 — emotional disturbance damages.
08Disposition
Judgment of dismissal reversed.
09Concurrence / Dissent
Concurrence and dissent: would allow the contract count but not an independent tort theory.
10Notes / Pitfalls
Pitfall: this is a contract-damages exception, not a freestanding tort of negligent infliction.
11Precedential Impact
Leading California authority for the mortuary/remains exception to the no-emotional-distress rule in contract.