Allen v. Jones

Rex Allen, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Gerald Jones, Defendant and Respondent.

Court
Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Dist., Div. Two
Decided
1980-08-26
Docket
21504
Published
published

01Procedural Posture

Plaintiff sued a crematorium for negligence and emotional distress after his brother's remains were lost in shipment. Demurrer sustained without leave to amend; plaintiff appealed.

02Substantive Facts

The defendant agreed to cremate and ship the remains of plaintiff's brother. The container arrived empty; the remains were never recovered.

03Issue

Whether damages for emotional distress are recoverable for negligent breach of a contract to handle human remains.

04Rule

Emotional-distress damages are recoverable in contract where the contract's subject matter is such that serious emotional disturbance is a particularly likely result of breach.

05Holding

Yes. The complaint states a cause of action for mental distress damages.

06Rationale / Reasoning

Contracts concerning the disposition of human remains are entered into for peace of mind rather than pecuniary advantage; economic loss alone would leave the breach effectively unremedied.

07Doctrine / Tests

Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 353 — emotional disturbance damages.

08Disposition

Judgment of dismissal reversed.

09Concurrence / Dissent

Concurrence and dissent: would allow the contract count but not an independent tort theory.

10Notes / Pitfalls

Pitfall: this is a contract-damages exception, not a freestanding tort of negligent infliction.

11Precedential Impact

Leading California authority for the mortuary/remains exception to the no-emotional-distress rule in contract.